Pete Buttigieg Says There’s Nothing To Gain By Moving US Embassy Back To Tel Aviv

Pete Buttigieg hosts a town hall meeting in Fort Dodge, Iowa, April 16, 2019. (Scott Olson/Getty Images via JTA)

(JTA) — Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg said he would not move the U.S. Embassy back to Tel Aviv from Jerusalem.

“I think what’s done is done,” Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, said Sunday in an interview with “Axios on HBO.”

He went on to say:  Look, we need a big-picture strategy on the Middle East. I don’t know that we’d gain much by moving it to Tel Aviv.”

Pressed on whether Buttigieg did the right thing in making the move, Buttigieg suggested that Trump should have offered it as a reward for Israeli movement on the peace process.

“[I]f you’re going to give somebody something that they’ve wanted for a long time in the context of a push-pull, even with a strong ally like Israel … you don’t do that without getting some kind of concession. Instead, we’ve seen the Israeli government continue to act in ways that are detrimental to peace. And I believe, therefore, also detrimental to U.S. interests.”

The same is true, he said, with regard to the Trump administration’s recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan.

“The Israeli claims in the Golan are not something to be ignored, they have a lot to do with legitimate security interests,” Buttigieg said. But U.S. recognition, he said, “was given away” and “worse probably for the specific purpose to have an impact in Israeli domestic politics, which should be the last reason that we would be conducting American foreign policy.”

Asked about the Palestinian “right of return” for refugees issue, Buttigieg was short on specifics, saying “I think that concept can be honored in the context of a negotiated peace.”

Men's Shoes

Pete Buttigieg

israel

Join The Discussion

Blueprint Calendars